# How to Travel More Sustainably — Without Giving Up Flying Entirely

> Aviation is responsible for around 2.5% of global CO2 emissions. Here is a realistic look at what travellers can do to reduce their impact.

*Section: Travel — By Elena Marsh (Environment & Climate Correspondent) — Published December 27, 2025 — 1 min read*

Canonical URL: https://dailyjunction.org/travel/how-to-travel-more-sustainably
Tags: sustainable travel, carbon footprint, flying, eco tourism, environment

## Key takeaways

- Aviation accounts for around 2.5% of CO2 emissions but 3.5% of effective radiative forcing (including contrail effects)
- A return long-haul flight has a larger carbon footprint than driving a car for a year
- Offsets are imperfect but better than nothing — choose high-quality carbon removal projects, not avoided-deforestation
- Staying longer and travelling less frequently to further destinations reduces per-trip impact significantly

## The aviation impact

Aviation accounts for approximately 2.5% of global CO2 emissions — significant but not the largest sector. However, at altitude, the effects of aviation emissions are amplified: contrails (condensation trails) form cirrus clouds that trap heat, and the nitrogen oxides emitted in the upper troposphere have additional warming effects. Taking these into account, aviation's effective contribution to global warming is estimated at around 3.5% of total radiative forcing.

## The per-person impact

A return economy class flight from London to New York emits approximately 1.7 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per passenger (1.0 tonnes of CO2 multiplied by an uplift factor for high-altitude warming effects). For context, the UK government's net zero pathway implies the average UK citizen should emit around 2.5 tonnes of CO2 total per year by 2030 across all activities. Long-haul flying makes achieving any meaningful personal carbon reduction extremely difficult.

## What you can do

Flight options: choose economy over business class (business class seats take up more space, so the per-seat emissions are proportionally higher); choose direct routes over connecting flights (takeoff and landing are the most fuel-intensive phases); choose newer aircraft (typically 15-25% more efficient per seat than older equivalents). Alternatives: for journeys under 1,000km in Europe, the Eurostar and other high-speed rail alternatives have roughly 6-10 times lower emissions than flying. Carbon offsets are imperfect — choose high-quality removal projects (biochar, direct air capture) over avoided-deforestation projects where the additionality and permanence are harder to verify.

## The behaviour change

The most significant practical action for frequent flyers is to fly less and stay longer. Taking fewer trips to further destinations and spending more time in each place is both lower-impact and arguably higher-quality travel than short, frequent trips. Domestic tourism and regional European travel by rail are substantially lower-impact than international travel.

## Frequently asked questions

### Who writes these articles?

Our articles are written by experienced journalists and subject-matter experts. See the author bio below each article.

### How can I share this article?

Use the share buttons below the article to share on social media, or copy the link directly.

## Sources

- [Lonely Planet](https://www.lonelyplanet.com)
- [Conde Nast Traveller](https://www.cntraveller.com)

---
Daily Junction — https://dailyjunction.org/travel/how-to-travel-more-sustainably