Crown Court is where the most serious criminal cases in England and Wales are tried—murder, rape, robbery, serious fraud, and other indictable offences that carry the heaviest penalties. Unlike magistrates' courts, where cases are decided by lay magistrates or district judges, Crown Court trials are heard by a judge and jury, with the jury of 12 members of the public deciding guilt or innocence and the judge deciding sentencing and legal issues. Crown Court judges have unlimited sentencing powers up to the statutory maximum for each offence, including life imprisonment for the most serious crimes. Understanding how Crown Court works—from jury selection to sentencing—is essential if you are facing serious charges, called for jury service, or simply trying to understand how the most serious crimes are prosecuted in Britain.
What Is Crown Court?
Crown Court is the second tier of criminal courts in England and Wales, sitting above magistrates' courts and below the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). There are around 75 Crown Court centres across England and Wales, ranging from large city courts (e.g., the Old Bailey in London, Manchester Crown Court) to smaller regional centres.
Crown Court handles:
1. Indictable Offences (Serious Crimes)
Indictable offences are the most serious crimes, which can only be tried in Crown Court. Examples include:
- Murder, manslaughter, attempted murder
- Rape, sexual assault of a child
- Robbery (theft with force or threat of force)
- Serious fraud (over £100,000)
- Drug trafficking (Class A drugs)
- Kidnapping, false imprisonment
Indictable offences account for around 30-40% of Crown Court cases. In 2023, Crown Court handled around 30,000 indictable offences, according to Ministry of Justice statistics from December 2024.
2. Either-Way Offences (Mid-Level Crimes)
Either-way offences can be tried in either magistrates' court or Crown Court. They reach Crown Court if:

- Magistrates decline jurisdiction (believe their sentencing powers are insufficient)
- The defendant elects Crown Court trial (chooses jury trial over magistrates' court trial)
Examples of either-way offences include:
- Theft, burglary (of non-dwelling)
- Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH)
- Fraud (under £100,000)
- Drug possession with intent to supply (Class B or C drugs)
Either-way offences account for around 50-60% of Crown Court cases. In 2023, Crown Court handled around 45,000 either-way offences.
3. Sentencing for Either-Way Offences Committed by Magistrates
If a defendant is convicted of an either-way offence in magistrates' court, but the magistrates believe their sentencing powers (6-12 months imprisonment) are insufficient, they can commit the defendant to Crown Court for sentencing. The Crown Court judge can then impose a sentence up to the statutory maximum for the offence.
In 2023, magistrates committed around 5,000 defendants to Crown Court for sentencing.
4. Appeals from Magistrates' Court
Crown Court hears appeals from magistrates' court against:
- Conviction (retrial by a Crown Court judge and two magistrates)
- Sentence (re-sentencing by a Crown Court judge and two magistrates)
Appeals are heard by a judge and two magistrates (not a jury). The appeal is a rehearing (the case is tried again from scratch), not a review of the magistrates' decision.
In 2023, Crown Court heard around 3,000 appeals from magistrates' court.
Who Are Crown Court Judges?
Crown Court cases are heard by different levels of judges depending on the seriousness of the offence:
1. High Court Judges (Red Judges)
High Court judges (also called puisne judges) are the most senior trial judges. They:
- Try the most serious cases (murder, rape, serious fraud, terrorism)
- Wear red robes (hence "red judges")
- Are addressed as "My Lord" or "My Lady"
- Are appointed from senior barristers or solicitors with at least 7 years' experience as a barrister or solicitor-advocate
There are around 90 High Court judges who sit in Crown Court (they also sit in the High Court for civil cases).
2. Circuit Judges
Circuit judges are the main Crown Court judges. They:
- Try most indictable and either-way offences (except the most serious)
- Wear purple robes
- Are addressed as "Your Honour"
- Are appointed from barristers or solicitors with at least 7 years' experience
There are around 600 circuit judges in England and Wales.
3. Recorders
Recorders are part-time judges who:
- Try less serious either-way offences and some indictable offences
- Are barristers or solicitors who sit as judges part-time (typically 15-30 days per year)
- Are addressed as "Your Honour"
There are around 1,200 recorders in England and Wales.
4. District Judges (Magistrates' Courts)
District judges (magistrates' courts) can sit in Crown Court to hear appeals from magistrates' court, sitting with a circuit judge or recorder and one other magistrate.
How Crown Court Trials Work
Crown Court trials follow a structured process:
1. Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing (PTPH)
The defendant's first appearance in Crown Court is the Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing (PTPH), usually held within 28 days of the case being sent from magistrates' court. At the PTPH:
- The indictment (formal written charges) is read to the defendant
- The defendant enters a plea (guilty or not guilty) to each count
- If the defendant pleads guilty, the judge proceeds to sentencing (either immediately or after a pre-sentence report)
- If the defendant pleads not guilty, the judge sets a trial date and gives directions (e.g., prosecution must serve evidence by a certain date, defence must serve a defence statement)
2. Pre-Trial Hearings
Before trial, there may be pre-trial hearings to resolve legal issues, such as:
- Admissibility of evidence (e.g., whether a confession was obtained lawfully)
- Abuse of process (e.g., whether the prosecution has delayed the trial unreasonably)
- Severance (whether multiple defendants should be tried separately)
These hearings are held without the jury to avoid prejudicing them.
3. Jury Selection
On the day of trial, a jury of 12 is selected from a jury pool (typically 20-30 people summoned for jury service). The process is:
- Jury panel called — the court clerk calls 12 names at random from the jury pool
- Jurors sworn in — each juror takes an oath (or affirms) to "faithfully try the defendant and give a true verdict according to the evidence"
- Challenges — the prosecution or defence can challenge jurors: - Challenge for cause (e.g., the juror knows the defendant or has a conflict of interest) — unlimited - Stand by (prosecution only, used to remove a juror without giving a reason, but rarely used) - Peremptory challenge (defence challenge without giving a reason) — abolished in 1988
Once 12 jurors are sworn in, the trial begins. If the trial is expected to last more than a few days, the judge may swear in 1-2 reserve jurors in case a juror becomes ill or is discharged.
4. Trial Process
The trial follows this structure:
a. Prosecution Opening Speech
The prosecutor outlines the case, explains the charges, and summarizes the evidence the prosecution will present. The prosecutor must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
b. Prosecution Evidence
The prosecution calls witnesses, who:
- Give evidence-in-chief (answer questions from the prosecutor)
- Are cross-examined by the defence (questioned to challenge their evidence)
- May be re-examined by the prosecutor (to clarify points raised in cross-examination)
Evidence can include:
- Witness testimony (eyewitnesses, police officers, experts)
- Physical evidence (weapons, CCTV footage, forensic evidence)
- Documentary evidence (bank statements, phone records, medical records)
c. Defence Case
After the prosecution closes its case, the defence can:
- Submit there is no case to answer (argue the prosecution evidence is insufficient) — if the judge agrees, the jury is directed to acquit
- Call defence witnesses (including the defendant, if they choose to testify)
- Present no evidence (rely on the prosecution's failure to prove guilt)
The defendant has the right to silence—they are not required to testify. However, under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, the jury can draw adverse inferences (negative conclusions) if the defendant:
- Fails to testify without good reason
- Fails to mention something when questioned by police that they later rely on at trial
d. Closing Speeches
After all evidence is heard:
- The defence gives a closing speech, summarizing their case and challenging the prosecution evidence
- The prosecution gives a closing speech, summarizing their case and arguing the evidence proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt
e. Judge's Summing Up
The judge sums up the case for the jury, explaining:
- The law (what the prosecution must prove to establish guilt)
- The evidence (a neutral summary of the evidence from both sides)
- The burden and standard of proof (the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt)
- Directions (e.g., how to treat hearsay evidence, how to assess witness credibility)
The judge must be neutral—they cannot direct the jury to convict, but they can direct the jury to acquit if the prosecution evidence is insufficient.
f. Jury Deliberation
The jury retires to a private room to deliberate. They must:
- Elect a foreperson (spokesperson)
- Discuss the evidence and reach a verdict
- Base their verdict solely on the evidence (not on sympathy, prejudice, or media reports)
Initially, the jury must try to reach a unanimous verdict (all 12 agree). If the jury cannot reach a unanimous verdict after at least 2 hours 10 minutes (or longer for complex cases), the judge can accept a majority verdict (10-2 or 11-1). If the jury cannot reach even a majority verdict, the judge discharges the jury, and the prosecution can seek a retrial.
g. Verdict
The jury returns to court and the foreperson announces the verdict:
- Guilty — the judge proceeds to sentencing
- Not guilty — the defendant is acquitted and released (the prosecution cannot appeal an acquittal)
If there are multiple counts (charges), the jury gives a verdict on each count separately.
5. Sentencing
If the defendant is found guilty (or pleads guilty), the judge sentences based on sentencing guidelines from the Sentencing Council. The process is:
- Prosecution outlines the facts and the defendant's previous convictions (if any)
- Defence mitigation — the defence lawyer argues for a lower sentence (e.g., the defendant has shown remorse, has family responsibilities, is unlikely to reoffend)
- Pre-sentence report (if ordered) — a report from the Probation Service assessing the defendant's risk and suitability for community sentences
- Judge's sentencing remarks — the judge explains the sentence and the reasons for it
Crown Court judges have unlimited sentencing powers up to the statutory maximum for each offence. Examples:
- Murder — mandatory life imprisonment (minimum term set by the judge, typically 15-30 years, but can be whole life for the most serious cases)
- Rape — up to life imprisonment (typical sentences range from 4-19 years depending on aggravating and mitigating factors)
- Robbery — up to life imprisonment (typical sentences range from 1-12 years)
- Fraud — up to 10 years (or 14 years for some fraud offences)
Sentences can include:
- Immediate custody (prison or young offender institution)
- Suspended sentence (prison sentence suspended for up to 2 years, served only if the offender reoffends)
- Community order (unpaid work, curfew, rehabilitation, drug/alcohol treatment)
- Fine (unlimited, but rare in Crown Court)
- Discharge (absolute or conditional)
The Crown Court Backlog Crisis
Crown Court has faced a growing backlog of cases since 2020, driven by:
- COVID-19 pandemic — courts closed or operated at reduced capacity for months in 2020-2021
- Barristers' strikes — criminal barristers went on strike in 2022-2023 over legal aid pay, delaying thousands of trials
- Underfunding — Crown Court sitting days were cut by 20% between 2010 and 2020 due to budget cuts
As of December 2024, the Crown Court backlog stood at over 60,000 cases, according to MoJ statistics. The average time from offence to completion in Crown Court is over 400 days (compared to around 200 days in 2010).
The backlog has serious consequences:
- Victims and witnesses wait years for trials, prolonging trauma and reducing the quality of evidence (memories fade)
- Defendants on bail wait years for trial, living under the cloud of charges
- Defendants in custody wait months or years for trial, often serving longer on remand than they would serve if convicted
The government has pledged to reduce the backlog by increasing Crown Court sitting days and recruiting more judges, but progress has been slow.
Legal Aid in Crown Court
Legal aid in Crown Court is not means-tested at the time of trial. If you are tried in Crown Court and acquitted, legal aid is free. If you are convicted, you may have to pay a contribution based on your means (income and assets).
The contribution is assessed after conviction and can be:
- A lump sum (if you have capital over £30,000)
- Monthly payments (if you have disposable income over £3,398 per year)
If you cannot afford a lawyer privately and do not qualify for legal aid (rare in Crown Court), you can represent yourself, but this is strongly discouraged for serious criminal charges.
The Bottom Line
Crown Court handles the most serious criminal cases in England and Wales, including all indictable offences (murder, rape, robbery) and either-way offences where magistrates decline jurisdiction or the defendant elects jury trial. Trials are heard by a judge and jury of 12 members of the public, with the jury deciding guilt and the judge deciding sentencing and legal issues. Crown Court judges have unlimited sentencing powers up to the statutory maximum for each offence, including life imprisonment for the most serious crimes. The Crown Court backlog has grown to over 60,000 cases as of late 2024, with the average time from offence to completion exceeding 400 days. Understanding how Crown Court works is essential if you are facing serious charges or called for jury service.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Crown Court and magistrates' court?
Crown Court handles serious crimes (indictable offences like murder, rape, robbery) and either-way offences where the defendant elects jury trial or magistrates decline jurisdiction. Trials are by judge and jury, and judges have unlimited sentencing powers up to the statutory maximum. Magistrates' court handles minor crimes (summary offences) and some either-way offences, with trials by magistrates (no jury) and sentencing powers limited to 6-12 months imprisonment. Crown Court also hears appeals from magistrates' court.
How are juries selected for Crown Court trials?
Juries are randomly selected from the electoral register. If you are aged 18-75, registered to vote, and have lived in the UK for at least 5 years since age 13, you can be summoned for jury service. At court, 12 jurors are selected by ballot from the jury pool. Both prosecution and defence can challenge jurors (ask them to stand down) for cause (e.g., knowing the defendant), but peremptory challenges (without giving a reason) were abolished in 1988. Jurors must be impartial and decide the case based solely on the evidence.
Can Crown Court judges overrule a jury's verdict?
No. If the jury finds the defendant not guilty, the judge must acquit—there is no appeal against an acquittal. If the jury finds the defendant guilty, the judge must accept the verdict and proceed to sentencing. However, the judge can direct the jury to acquit if the prosecution evidence is insufficient (a 'directed acquittal'), and the judge can discharge the jury if it cannot reach a verdict, leading to a retrial. The judge cannot direct the jury to convict.